Sorry, I missed that there was someone named "Lefts" commenting in the threat, so it made you sound more incoherent than usual. Again, apologies.So, to your other questions/assertions:>>>"Because you're on here being dicks to anyone who read the article and thought it raised some questions."Interesting that you would see it as some sort of jihad, since I posted in response to your comment only. Not a single post to "anyone" else.>>>Illustrate that you have the right to demean people for having questions. You work on the LHC?Oddly, wrong again. You didn't ask a question, you made an observation, namely "I was ok about the LHC...now I read this article and I'm uneasy about the LHC."I don't need to work at the LHC to laugh at you. Even amateur scientists can laugh at some of the statements you've made.When you enter a discussion on a scientific subject, discussing a scientific experiment, and then proceed to claim that it "makes you uneasy," it is also fair for me to point out what other things make you uneasy, namely falling out of favor with God and ghosts.That speaks directly to how much you understand and have devoted yourself to scientific thought. There's nothing wrong with stating, in a public forum, that you believe in ghosts, but you have to understand that when you approach people who understand science with a list of other things that make you nervous and it includes ghosts, we're going to laugh at you.And why did I "creepily" go back into your history? That's easy -- I remembered that you had made silly statements in the past and I looked them up. Simple.So please, try not to have such a thin skin -- you're the one who walked in here and made an assertion to a group of people, and I, and several others, reacted in a perfectly natural way under the circumstances -- with riotous laughter.Sorry kid, but science is not as forgiving as God.