| hrt hair loss :: hair loss thyroid |
| Author |
Message |
Eunoka
Guest
|
Posted: 10 16 2009 Post subject: menopause and hair loss |
|
|
Comcast is definitely a crappy company. I hate them like poison.
"[This] has now led Australia to reconsider the game's MA15+ rating."No, it hasn't. The Office of Film and Literature Classification has said that they won't be reviewing their decision.The OFLC isn't the problem here, it is the fact that an R18 rating for games is blocked by the South Australian Attorney-General Michael Atkinson. I have zero respect for that guy.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
VENKKAT
Guest
|
Posted: 10 15 2009 Post subject: hair loss restoration |
|
|
|
“Did you forget the /s?
|
|
| Back to top |
|
Soumyaranjan
Guest
|
Posted: 10 14 2009 Post subject: Online casinos free play |
|
|
Hey! Listen!.
Nope. Everyone switched over to Windows 7 in a matter of weeks.!
|
|
| Back to top |
|
Carmelisa
Guest
|
Posted: 10 12 2009 Post subject: hair loss restoration |
|
|
survey says... yup dumbest comment ever?
"Removal."".""" |
|
| Back to top |
|
Learra
Guest
|
Posted: 10 11 2009 Post subject: drugs that cause hair loss |
|
|
more like ownedchap

|
|
| Back to top |
|
Noelissa
Guest
|
Posted: 10 10 2009 Post subject: hypothyroidism hair loss |
|
|
|
Sponsored by The Fourth Kind
|
|
| Back to top |
|
Nagiib
Guest
|
Posted: 09 12 2009 Post subject: cause of hair loss in young woman |
|
|
|
Reminds me of the chocolate river in the WIlly Wonka movie.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
Lorna
Guest
|
Posted: 09 09 2009 Post subject: hair loss restoration |
|
|
|
!
|
|
| Back to top |
|
Jordy
Guest
|
Firstly, some people research stuff for the sake of scientific advancement to improve our understanding of the universe and advance the human race. Crazy huh.The Large Hadron Collider isn't going to produce anything that is patentable. Nor will any of the space probes or rovers NASA/ESA are launching to Mercuty/Mars/Pluto and so on.Scientific advancement won't stop because people can't patent stuff.In addition to that, companies will research new technologies so they can sell products based on it first. If you are a company testing for cancer then you will want to cover as many genes in your tests as possible. You will want to be able to claim you do something extra the competition doesn't even if they will start to do it shortly after.The other issue to remember is that as technology does advance, testing genes and such will become much easier to research. For example we have automated robots that can alter genes in yeast, grow the yeast and work out what those genes do. Those robots could be patenting the genes by the millions. Computer simulations will be possible later on, just hit a button, get all the results on the human genome and patent everyone.Also having access too all the genetic information could actually accelerate scientific understanding. You might not be able to do much with 1 or 2 genes but when you see how they all increase the chance of cancer, maybe there is a common property that would allow a large amount of cancer to be stopped or slowed down.The other issue is they aren't actually creating the genes, they are just working out what they do. They didn't make a gene that detects cancer, they just found genes that already existed that are linked to cancer.Not to mention that by restricting the test they are outright killing people. |
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
| 9 User(s) are reading this topic (8 Guests and 40 Anonymous Users) |
|
 |
|